Zamenhof's Table (significantly eases learning)

 

-u

Person or specified thing

-o

Unspecified thing

-a

Type, Kind

-es

Owner

-e(n)

Place (Direction)

-el

Manner

-am

Time

-al

Reason

-om

Amount

 

ki-

question, relative

kiu

who

kio

what

kia

what kind of

kies

whose

kie(n)

(to) where

kiel

how

kiam

when

kial

why

kiom

how much

ti-

that

tiu

that (one)

Tio

that (thing)

tia

that kind of

ties

that one’s

tie(n)

(to) there

tiel

in that way

tiam

then

tial

therefore

tiom

that much

i-

any

iu

anyone

io

anything

ia

any kind of

ies

anyone’s

ie(n)

(to) anywhere

iel

anyway

iam

whenever

ial

for any reason

iom

any amount

neni-

none

neniu

no-one

nenio

nothing

nenia

no kind of

nenies

no-one’s

nenie(n)

(to) nowhere

neniel

in no way

neniam

never

nenial

for no reason

neniom

no amount

ĉi-

all, every

ĉiu(j)

everyone

ĉio

everything

ĉia

every kind of

ĉies

everyone’s

ĉie(n)

(to) everywhere

ĉiel

in every way

ĉiam

always

ĉial

for every reason

ĉiom

alles

 

Explanations:

1) The table-words ending with -u are used as stand-alone words (who = kiu, anyone = iu, no-one = neniu, etc.) but also as adjectives (which house = kiu domo, any book = iu libro). They take -j for plural and -n when used as direct object, just as normal nouns and adjectives: "Mi ne konas ĉiujn homojn" (I don’t know all humans).

2) The table-words ending with -o are naturally nouns, used only in the singular. They can take the -n ending when used as direct object: "Tion mi ne scias" (That I don’t know).

3) The table-words ending with –a are adjectives and used to further describe a noun: "Kia homo li estas?" (What kind of a person is he?). They take -j for plural and -n when used as direct object. "Tiajn frazojn li ne uzas" (Such phrases he doesn’t use).

4) The table-words ending with -es are adjectives and are used to further describe a noun: "Kies monujo estas tio?" (Whose purse is that?). These table-words are invariant and never take any endings.

5) The table-words ending with -e, -el, -am, -al and -om are adverbs and so remain invariant (no endings).  Only the -e words may take a final -n to give the special meaning of a direction of motion. "Mi ne volas iri tien" (I don’t want to go [to] there).

6) The table-words beginning with ki- are question-words as well as relative pronouns: "Kiu estas tie?" (Who is there?).  "Mi ne scias kiam li alvenos" (I don’t know when he will arrive). Questions in Esperanto always begin with a question-word  or with "Ĉu" (for yes/no questions).

7) The difference between "this / that" or "here / there" is made by adding the word "ĉi", to indicate something nearby: ĉi tiu domo - this house, ĉio ĉi - all this here.

8) The adverbs listed in point 5) above can be extended to become nouns or adjectives:  tiam - then, at that time; la tiama ĉefo - the chief at that time. Or: kial - why; la kialo – the reason. Further adverbs can also be built: A very common example is "iomete" (a little bit), which comes from "iom" (some amount), the diminutive suffix "-et-" and a final "-e" marking the word as a normal adverb.

9) The word fragment "neni-" is used in building the word "neniigi" (to nullify, destroy).

10) To express "something pretty" or "nothing good" or "(I wish you) all the best", one uses the appropriate -o table-word.  Since these are nouns, the additional description "pretty", "good", etc. are treated as adjectives, giving: "io bela", "nenio bona" or "(Mi deziras al vi) ĉion bonan".